Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

Norton Connecting Rods RR56 Alloy, Hiduminium

Forums

R.R.56 [1]

Melting point635 °C

Density2.75

Composition

Aluminium93.7%

Copper2.0%

Iron1.4%

Nickel1.3%

Magnesium0.8%

Silicon0.7%

Titanium0.1%

The Material is/was used in Aero-Engines, not sure what RPM aero-engines  turned over at, maybe at 2,500 rpm-3,000 rpm, but lots of torque; also not sure how many hours in flight these Aero-Engines withstood, before a major  strip-down. But, RR56 is  fairly strong tough stuff!

Perhaps, the Norton engines, vibration,Is the key, to connecting rod possible fatigue woes and why the 88 and it's shorter stroke is smoother & more reliable than the 99?

In a section on production racing in Mick Walker's book, it only mentions 88s & the Dominator 650 SS, was this due to class limits in cc or reliability?  Norton's  I   believe, didn't  dynamically balance  crankshafts unlike Royal Enfield! Do people have this done?

I want my engine to be reliable and efficient in operation. I notice there seems to be some filtration, gauzes in the pressure release valve, a Sump sludge trap in the drain plug, a sludge trap in the crank, a filter in the Oil-tank is an external paper oil-filter necessary too, for particles in the level of 25-50 or above, microns absolutely vital?

 

The Connecting Rods of the 88 & 99 and 650 has anyone got photos of them and how the differ, stamped numbers e.t.c ?

 

Cheers

John

Permalink

I understand that the type of oil filtration used is dependent on oil types.  An old-school monograde like Castrol XL doesn't need fine filtering, such as provided by paper filters.  A 'modern' multigrade oil however, DOES need 'proper' filtration as the detritus is kept in suspension until it reaches the more efficient fine filter, otherewide it continues to circulate and damage bearing surfaces.  I think this is why NorVil recommend the old original specification monogrades.  We used to run our bikes on Duckhams Q 20/50 when it came out in the 1960s - we didn't know any better then!

Permalink

Hi Lionel, I ran my BSA on Castrol GTX and Duckhams QXR 20/50 s, it was felt that Multi-grades were better for your engine or that was the impression I got, through viscosity tolerances and temperature variables. If one oil carries round particles more than another, I suppose it could have been down to additives, like detergents-type additions. I would have thought a straight oil would be more prone to suspension load, but I am no motor oil expert.  Perhaps, Norvil has a warehouse full of straight oils and he needs to shift it! Now, they tell me oils are designed for friction efficiency and MPG targets and not necessarily, against engine wear!

On a racer the oil and sometimes the engine only has to last for one race! On the road a different set of circumstances present themselves!

John

I stand by what I said John as it isn't only Norvil that recommend mono. Norvil's quote below - 

"When An External Oil Filter Is Fitted Choose A Detergent Oil, If No External Oil Filter Is Fitted Choose A Non-Detergent Oil"

Permalink

Hello well I still use Duckhams Q 20/50 costs a bit more but still good top oils see www.Duckhams oils/UK , Yours Anna j

Permalink

Having worked for a bearing manufacturer for 25 years I can assure you that the best investment you can make is fitting an oil filter. Fitting it in the return only exposes the engine to dirt getting in through the oil cap, if you can't keep that clean then you should not own any internal combustion device. 

Hi John so Bearings, I have been looking round  and prices vary a lot, I want to replace the Main bearings, maybe wheel bearings and Taper roller Bearings for the steering head, which would be the best brand and is there information on fitting an external oil filter?

 

 

Cheers

 

John

Permalink

Like many Norvil confuse Detergency with Dispersancy. Detergents keep hot surfaces clean and so ensure piston rings remain unstuck, carbon does not build up on the piston grooves and lands and so increase wear , they also neutralise the acids produced in combustion and those produced by oxidation of the base oil. Dispersants stop sludge, formed by combustion water amd unburnt fuel fragments fron agglomerating into large chunks whick block oilways. They also stop soot from doing the agglomerating into larger lumps which remove the anti-wear films formed by ZDDP's. Both these are good things. Some time ago I contacted many of the classic oil suppliers and asked them why, since good detergency and dispersancy are desirale attributes, I should not use their main line products in my Dommie. Only 1 replied and they agreed with me.Also, remember,no supplier of monograde oils can ensure the claimed performance claims are valid  as the test methods needed are not available.

Permalink

Thanks Charles for that. Can you comment on this story that using a modern oil after a 'non detergent' oil does indeed run the risk of detaching deposits? And reading the info on, say, Morris 40 monograde  they are a bit coy about denying the presence of detergent additives. In other words I suspect with no evidence that the oils marketed as 'traditional' are nothing of the sort!

Permalink

I have not seen any evidence that higher than original detrgent oils will remove hard baked on deposits. Even 'traditional' oils contained detergents albeit at lower levels than a modern oil.

Permalink

I use Silkolene  Super 4 10/40 Semi-Synthetic in my high-rpm  red-lines @ 12,500 rpm but will creep past if allowed, 398 cc Kawasaki, it is £32 approx, the bike being 1987 has a car type filter housed in the engine. I change the oil and filter every 6,000 miles, the inside of  the engine is shiny and  sparkling clean to cutlery standards.

Have you noticed too, how everything to do with Motorcycles is dearer than the car alternative!

 

Was Sikolene always Fuchs? I don't seem to remember it being so a few decades ago.

 

John

Permalink

After using non/low detergent "classic" oil for years I am now running a 10/40 fully synth oil in my 99. Usually after an oil change the Classic oil went dark brown /black very quickly. Some months ago I changed out the Synth (very dirty) and replaced with same. It has stayed very clean. I had thought I would find the 10/40 far too thin for summer use .Last week I had a carb issue and the motor ran so hot it suffered pre-ignition and would carry on running with the ignition off.The problem is now sorted and the motor sounds quieter than it ever did,so no damage.I will switch to a 20/50 fully synth when my stock runs out..I'm now a convert to modern oil.A filter is on my list.

Permalink

That's been a more interesting and informative oil thread than the usual..thanks chaps. (Even though it's moved a long way from con rods...)

Permalink

David,  people on Ebay are claiming 88 & 99 and sometimes Dominator 650 SS conrods are all the same, now Anna told me 99 conrods are 1.2 mm longer than 88 con rods  and I looked at some early Norton model & con rods on Ebay, which had no numbers on them until he produced more photos and these are the one in the first post. When he added more photos the con-rods pictured turned out to be very early Norton 7 con-rods , which of course no use to someone like me with an Atlas engine and two 99 engines.

 

I  read somewhere that apparently, BSA blank twin con-rods, 500/ Star/Golden Flash,  are very similar to Norton con-rods, you would think that someone somewhere would have sorted this out long ago and con-rods could be supplied new as forged alternatives duplicating the original form.

 

 

John

Permalink

 88 and 99 rods are identical but 650/750 rods won't fit the 88/99 Not really a good idea to fit  SH rods or even turn rods round or swop over as load reversals  cause extra stress.  For the 88/99 you either fit used SH and take it easy with fingers crossed or buy Thunder rods. The 650/750 rods are still supplied new.  E-Bay is a complete lottery, Used parts described as NOS ,Scrap sold as serviceable, parts wrongly identified. 

 



© 2024 Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans