Dismantling to sort the chaincase as well as discover why the gearbox sprocket was so tight to turn. With the clutch plates out, it was easier to turn the clutch hub and sprocket. Removed the clutch hub , now trying the sprocket I can feel the notching of a very tight ball bearing , presumably the output brg next the outer seal. Examining the (new) clutch basket, it's clearly marked by the chain at the back, a too- far- inwards alignment issue. There's more - there are 5 plain plates, 4 friction, the parts book and Andovers' parts list shows 4 and 4. It has friction built into the basket so someone has put the extra plain against the back ( ie first in ). The only way to have 4 and 4 is a friction plate against the bonded friction in the basket. Is that right ? Never had to do that before.
This is someone's idea of "fully restored ". Oh well, I've got all winter.....
Regards all, Terry.
Sounds like the earlier…
- Log in to post comments
There’s a bearing at either…
There’s a bearing at either end of the mainshaft, but unusual for it to be tight unless something is out of line like a bent shaft. I don’t understand how the chain can hit the back of the clutch because the chain case should be between them! (I assume this was with the chaincase removed! But if it is that close, like Robert, I’d suspect that the clutch spider is worn and the clutch is sliding too far down the mainshaft. There should be a stop that lets it sit against the end of the shaft. It is possible that the clutch body is also touching the end of the sleeve gear which will tighten everything up - was the clutch loose when you tried it without the plates?
The number of plates shouldn’t be causing the mainshaft to be stiff? But yes there are two types of clutches one has the friction material on the basket and one doesn’t. I can never remember which is which! One has the bonded plates with the tangs outwards and the other has the tangs inwards. They cannot be mixed for obvious reasons!
Dan
- Log in to post comments
Thanks for having a look at…
Thanks for having a look at this Dan, without decent diagrams it's hard to work out. Re the chain marking the clutch basket, I meant the primary chain has left witness marks on the back of the teeth, meaning the whole assy is too far back towards the gearbox. No shims came off so I assume some will have to go in once the engine sprocket is in place to line up with.
The clutch friction plates have the tang. As the basket has friction material bonded in, the first plate has to be steel , which means 5 steel to have the outer alloy plate against steel, that should be OK though ,I'm sure, it all fits in the basket OK anyway.
Your ref to the spider going too far down the mainshaft is right. I just checked that and it is pre-loaded about .020" against that large output gear threaded end when tight. I can turn that off the boss at the back, I guess !, but, if there's shims needed to align the clutch with the engine. sprocket, where do they go ? on the splines inside the spider hub ? The actual clutch hub, nut slackened, revolves fairly easy by hand on the mainshaft, though I expected really easy. It's that large output end that is very very tight.
Oh for a quality sectional diagram. !
Regards, Terry.
- Log in to post comments
half and half plate?
Some thoughts. If your spider has started to 'climb' onto the gearbox mainshaft, I cant see it being easy to 'shim' it as it is a splined fit and inside the spider and there isn't much (any?) room there. Could be time to remortgage and get a new centre!
Don't forget that on some(maybe all? an expert will surely know and give his/her wisdom on this) of the clutch types, one of the friction plates is a 'one sided' plate, ie. there is friction material on one side and plain on the other. This goes next to the pressure plate. This may be only on the clutches with a plain basket though. Familiar with those as that is what my bike has.
Also check the gearbox sprocket tightness isn't due to the oil seal binding on the sprocket or the spacer being too tight within the seal.
Good Luck,
George.
- Log in to post comments
RGM sell a new spider that…
RGM sell a new spider that has a proper (full circle ) register that solves the problem of migration up the shaft. Its the only answer . Your orriginal is scrap . Once this problem starts the clutch will sometimes jam up on the shaft and need a decent puller to get it off. Fitting the spider is fun, need a ground flush socket to get a grip on the very shallow nuts to seperate the race plate. (which is shown back to front in some manuals ! Then I would recommend checking the roller/race clearance with a feeler and if more than 3 thou get a set of 1 thou oversize rollers which will reduce clutch wobble and transform your clutch /gearchange. Have fun fitting your new clutch rubbers too. Forget asking any Norton suppliers for the rollers , and no, a new race plate will only be worse than the old. They dont make things like they used to !!.
- Log in to post comments
Many thanks George. The last…
Many thanks George. The last items you mention are all OK. The first issue seems to be internal unwanted pre-load on the mainshaft. I'll just have to get inside the box to see what's going on.
Equal second is the fact that the spider is definitely too deep on the mainshaft. If I turn .020" off the boss at the back of the clutch hub, that should clear that , but then the chainwheel goes further out of true with the engine sprocket. I can't see any way of re-spacing the clutch assy to push it away from the gearbox. Yet.
Agreed a one sided plate would be ideal, but, as the clutch basket and all the plates are new, they are staying as is. It seems the previous owner has been sold a mismatch and added a 5th plain plate to sort it. Maybe cut one friction face off ? Hmmmm. So much cr*p work had been done on the chaincase , it had been run as a dry clutch with an O ring chain. Hopefully, if I leave it dry for the time being, the friction plates will be OK ? There is no felt seal between the clutch and gearbox , with the pair of sliding seal holders. They are rivetted direct to each other, slide OK but no way to put a seal in, so I assume the felt must go inside or outside ? Checking the forum I could'nt see an answer to that.
Can't believe I bought this thing now, oh well....
Regards all, Terry.
- Log in to post comments
Sliding seal
Hi Terry,
I can only symphathise with your 'can of worms'!
Preload on mainshaft - has 'instant gasket' been used between inner cover and gearbox case instead of the proper gasket? That would take up a lot of the clearance.
Regarding the sliding seal holders, it sounds like they have been incorrectly fitted. The two halves should be installed facing away from each other such that there is a gap of around 3/16" (from memory - could be bigger) between them at the shaft hole. It is into this recess that the felt goes. It can only be put in with the case off. Even with the felt in place, excess oil can stop your left silencer rusting if the crank seal goes/ doesn't do its job, so I can only imagine it would be bad without a felt.
From the RGM website here is a picture of a Commando case with the discs fitted correctly.
Regards,
George
- Log in to post comments
Personally if the clutch is…
Personally if the clutch is migrating up the main shaft, I’d buy an RGM or Andover spider, Fun to fit but not impossible! Machining the boss won’t stop the back of the clutch rubbing on the chain case it they will in due course. The primary chain will also move out of line.
Ive just fitted the sliding seals to my chain case and confirm that the seal fits between them.
I have both a Norton and AMC clutch in the garage, I’ll try and have a look at which is which. Although I’m sure the manual or parts book will explain!
Your bigger problem is in the gearbox, the clutch is relatively easy to solve. Have you got one of the gearbox DVDs?
- Log in to post comments
Clutch plates
As far as the clutch plates go the earlier (Pre 57) Norton clutch had cork inserts in the basket while the later AMC clutch had the friction material in the basket.
When counting the plates: Do you have the double sided plate on the end? Next to the pressure plate?
And remember, later clutch baskets were longer to hold the extra plate in.
As for the sprocket being hard to turn: sounds like a bearing job.
- Log in to post comments
Some owners tighten the…
Some owners tighten the clutch nut very hard to stop it coming loose . The orriginal spiders have a very small segmented register that is weak. This buckles and partly rides up on the box shaft allowing the clutch to move into contact with the sleeve gear end. Grinding 20/30 thou off the back of the clutch seems a solution ,but is not. as it just accelerates the issue . Tried this ! . It just made the clutch impossible to get off without brute force .After repair I limit the nut torque to about 35 ft lbs and use a very close fitting washer under the nut to provide support and a little drop of nutlock. The axial load that this issue puts on the box bearing is probably very bad for it. The RGM spider I bought is about a third of the cost of the Andover part and was ok with a full circle register (that cannot be seen on the photos).
- Log in to post comments
Thanks all for the above…
Thanks all for the above advice, very useful. Clutch basket has material bonded in (both sides ). The basket is indeed deeper but I've since noticed the adjust screw has been touching the inside of the outer cover when clutch lever pulled in, that explains why the handlebar lever came against an invisible stop ! Yes, it's a 1.1/16" lever pivot.
The clutch spider does have a full internal register, I will wait until I've seen all the 'box internals before deciding what to do next in case there is an assembly issue partly behind this spacing problem.
There is no single sided friction plate, all 4 double, the extra plain one on last, next to the pressure plate.
I'll remove the twin sliding plates and see what it says, looks as though the 'opposite' way 'round will create a gap of around 3/8 ". Next job. Is the gearbox DVD better than the on-line write ups ?
Regards all, Terry
East Yorks.
- Log in to post comments
I found the Mick Hemmings…
I found the Mick Hemmings video a great help, the gearboxes are very straightforward. It’s possible that your mainshaft hasn’t seated properly, but they have been known to bend!
Regarding the clutch I’ve copied this from an other thread - I searched on “Clutch Types”if you click on this blue text it should take you there. So Mikael - let me start…
So Mikael - let me start with the AMC versions of clutches that came in with the 1957 Models. All of them share common parts but some parts are peculiar to specific models. So the Model 50 has seven plates, the ES2 , 88 and 99 have nine plates whilst the 650, 88SS, 99SS, Atlas and Mercury have eleven plates. Because they all share the same drum and centre they have different thicknesses of pressure plates to suit with the heftiest on the Model 50 and the thinest on the 650 etc. The 650 and SS models also share thinner bonded plates, a stronger shock absorber centre, longer spring studs and stronger springs. The Model 50, ES2, 88 and 99 use the same parts except for there being two plates less and a different pressure plate on the Model 50. All these clutches have plain steel plates with location tags on the outer rims and bonded plates with tags at the inner rim. They all appear to have been attacked by a nail gun during the manufacturing process. The sprocket/drums for all these clutches have a ground surface both sides. The mainshafts in all these models gearboxes are the same length so clutch adjustment is determined from the pressure plate, spring tension and adjustment screw whilst the clutch position is fixed by the mainshaft and clutch centre machining. The AMC Manx clutch does not share many items with the road bikes so I mention it only for completeness.
Prior to 1957 all the post-war models used the Norton Burman gearbox and clutch. These clutches have friction plates with tags at the outer rim and steel plates with tags on the inner. The clutch back-plate is plain so the sprocket/drum also has friction material. Many of the dimensions of these components are the same or very close to the AMC types so there are many opportunities to use odd combinations of parts. There are many different mainshafts and clutch centres for the various models to fix the position of the clutch. Some of the early plates used separate pieces of friction material and in the drum whilst many had bonded on material. Also many workshops modified the parts to fit or improve accordingly. The pressure plates had a fixed centre but many people fitted an adjustment screw.
So you can see why there are many pitfalls possible with Norton clutches, Pre-Commando of course. It's a nightmare if you don't buy an assembled item. Caveat emptor !! cheers, Howard
Dan
- Log in to post comments
Thanks Dan, I'll re-read…
Thanks Dan, I'll re-read that later, very interesting. So the 9 plates I have seems OK then ?. Out of interest, I've just measured how much lift there is before the outer plain plate touches the circlip -
1.3mm. If I were to remove one friction face and the outer plain steel, it would increase lift to 4.3mm. Way too much. I think I will live with the clutch as is. 4 double sided friction, 5 plain.
George, you're right, reversing the sliding plates does give around 3/16" for the seal. But, to re-rivet it , there must be spacers or the rivets will pull it together. Also , there is hardly anywhere for the seal to go in, the spacers and rivets will be in the way. It's a strange set-up !
Regards, Terry.
- Log in to post comments
Circlip !!!!
If the clutch drum is sporting a large circlip then it is either off a Commando or very, very early Dominator.
- Log in to post comments
My 1952 ES2..
.. has a circlip (although I have discarded it). It appears in the parts list as part number A2/398 described as "clutch plate retaining ring".
- Log in to post comments
Oh no !, not more…
Oh no !, not more complications ! It's a 1959 bike, the clutch drum is new, bonded friction front and rear, friction plates have external tang. The centre hub looks old but has the large outer circlip.
What the devil have I bought here ?
Re-checking the sprocket alignment, the clutch teeth seem to be about 1mm back, I could live with that considering the low mileage it will do (if I ever get it back on the road the way things are going ! ), but, I've got a simple idea how to sort that. Will try it and report in a couple of days.
Regards, Terry.
- Log in to post comments
Actually...
.. before anyone is misled it's the clutch centre that has the circlip (or plate retaining ring) on my 1952 model.
- Log in to post comments
I used small pop rivets to…
I used small pop rivets to join my Sealing plates, there is room, but you also need to make sure the slot in the chain case is the right size for it to slide in.
- Log in to post comments
Some gearbox latest ; I…
Some gearbox latest ; I took the outer cover off and slackened the inner. The main shaft and outer sleeve gear now rotate smoothly by hand, as you would expect. In addition, the kickstart lever was holding somewhat, that freed up as well, but only when the inner cover was slackened
Gaskets were in place, looking inside soon for assembly errors. Maybe some erroneous shims, will see......
- Log in to post comments
Sounds exciting, why don't…
Sounds exciting, why don't i have this much fun?, have to find a basket case.
- Log in to post comments
I do enjoy sorting technical…
I do enjoy sorting technical issues Robert, BUT, this 99 was a retail price "good original condition".....etc etc ,loads of new parts and re-build work done and ready to enjoy I was lead to believe. NOT a basket case !
For the first time in a long lifetime of classic bikes and classic cars - I've been done. Very cleverly too, it was in a top-end dealers' showroom looking pretty under the showroom lights next to sparkling new 'bikes, but , it was revealed after I was hooked on this shiny and beautiful looking 99, not owned by them ! - a private sale. Should have left it in hindsight, but I had no idea of the problems about to be discovered. Lash-ups galore.
Had a red 99 in 1966/67, my only transport, brilliant, never any trouble . £60 from a dealer in Mansfield. Finally had to have another before it's too late. Should have stuck with what I have already. Oh well, too late now.....another restoration job in progress. The main thing is, it's all original reg and chassis/engine numbers, it's not needing VAST expenditure, (so far ), just proper technical work ,so when back on the road, sorted, it will be enjoyable. Roll on 2022 and warm dry roads.
- Log in to post comments
Clutch too far inboard
Hi
I've followed this interesting thread for a while as I encountered similar problems (some years ago) fitting a belt drive conversion to a 1956 Dominator with an AMC gearbox. The Commando clutch was catching on the back of the chain case. I took the clutch and an old shaft to my local sheet metal works. They had a CNC machine and using measurements from the shaft and the back of the clutch they were able to make me some spilned shims to fit to the shaft therby 'pushing' the clutch outboard in the chaincase. It cost me £20.
This was mainly spent on setting up the machine to do the cutting from a piece of scrap 1mm sheet. The piece of scrap was large enough to make 6 such shims so I had 6 made. Two I used myself to aid fitting belt drives to my two Nortons. The rest I gave away to friends encountering similar problems.
- Log in to post comments
Hi Terry, You are not…
Hi Terry, You are not alone in having bought a "PUP" My last 3 bikes were the same Beatifull looking lash ups ! . Much better to buy a cheaper scruffy well used bike. With respect to any shims , Things will still work with the box sleeve gear under an axial load from the clutch ,but it will not work as well as it should.
- Log in to post comments
You're right Robert, it…
You're right Robert, it actually changed gear real sweet, my worry was what was going to be wearing away or overheating if I did'nt get rid of the pre-load. I like things to be 'right' , even if I make myself more work !
Re Harry's splined shim above, sounds like a very effective engineering style bargain. I also make my clutch teeth 1mm out of line, my idea is to space it out with 24, 1mm dia ball bearings (held in place with thick grease ). Just got a pack of 100 very old stock RHP ( ie probably very good quality ) from our local stockist ( Lodges' ), still in grease paper, as new, for £2.00 + vat. Spline depth is just bigger than 1mm. Will try it out later today. Too simple ? Soon find out !
- Log in to post comments
My idea of shimming out with…
My idea of shimming out with 1mm brgs won't work . The way the splines line up on the internal stop is not what I assumed it would be. In addition, a careful check over reveals the spider is well battered and a poor radial fit on the shaft splines. New spider required. Hopefully that may improve the chain alignment too. Club shop one seems a sensible price. More expense, but it's a crucial item.
Cush rubber job to do then, yuck.
- Log in to post comments
Good . It takes a very close…
Good . It takes a very close look into the spider to spot the problem. In fact every part of the clutch needs close scrutiny if you are not to be doing the job again later. Guess how I know this !! . After years of tinkering I can now sit at traffic lights with the clutch held in. Select neutral at a standstill and get first gear without a crunch. I can also pull the clutch in with one finger . Its only been 25 wasted years struggling to get there.
- Log in to post comments
Thanks Robert, I should have…
Thanks Robert, I should have had a closer look at the spider first, it's actually well past further use. From comments on here, the club spider needs a careful check over for symmetry before assembly. It was the last one in the clubs' stock. Fingers crossed it's a good one !
Regards from East Yorks.
- Log in to post comments
For a time RGM were selling…
For a time RGM were selling slightly wonky spiders at a very discounted price, I think they still worked ok. I have looked around for some OS rollers ,can't remember where I got them but they are not easy to find. I have a spare set .but am intending to fit to the Atlas clutch which I also intend to modify to incorporate the Kegler servo/slipper action as son who rides it has a weak grip. Just can't resist tinkering.
- Log in to post comments
Radial play ?
It is mentioned above that .001" oversize rollers can be added to limit radial play on the basket to clutch hub race. Just checked mine and there is .002" total, ie .001" per side. To add the .001" rollers would have it running at zero. Don't like that idea, but, what should it be ? I can't find any specifications like that anywhere. Can someone advise on this please ?
Got the spider out, was clearly very well machined and perfectly symetric. Just battered to death !
I must be mad, I'm enjoying this !
Regards all
- Log in to post comments
You need enough clearance to…
You need enough clearance to get the rollers in ,so 1 thou remaining is good. I had 31/2--4 thou so loosing 2 thou was great. This is a mod from the old Norton race bikes where if you had a draggy clutch your chances of a fast bump start and first off the line were gone.With less wobble you will also find that the outer edge of your plates no longer leave marks in the drum ! .
- Log in to post comments
That's good, at last,…
That's good, at last, something in good order !
- Log in to post comments
If the layshaft is a bit…
If the layshaft is a bit tight and is causing the box to be stiff, Mick Hemmings recommends tapping the end of the kickstart shaft to get it to seat correctly.
dan
- Log in to post comments
That's interesting Dan , I…
That's interesting Dan , I had thought it could be something to do with the layshaft when the kickstart shaft freed off after I had slackened the inner cover fasteners.
I'll give it a bash, as one says !
Meanwhile, following the point George made, above, that the sliding seal plates must be back to front, that's another job put right and a seal fitted. Luckily, the sliding plate error can't have been done too many miles previous as there was no metal to metal scoring ( no gap, so no seal ).
Regards all , great forum.
- Log in to post comments
Tight layshaft
Dan, you're the man ! I tightened the inner cover back up, smacked the end of the kickshaft with a copper faced and, hey presto, she's free !
Incredible instant result, many thanks for passing on the Mick Hemmings tip.
- Log in to post comments
Brilliant, I love a simple…
Brilliant, I love a simple fix, but the credit is due to Mick!
Now all you have to do is get the chain case and clutch sorted! If you fit a new spider it helps to use an old mainshaft to hold it and make a clutch holding tool out of an old clutch plate so you can fit the rubbers (get new ones) I made sure everything was clean and used some silicone gel to help get them in. It was still a bit of a fight!
Dan
- Log in to post comments
Thanks Dan, I'm confident…
Thanks Dan, I'm confident the clutch and chaincase issues are fairly well sorted now, a dry assembly soon to check things out. The new spider is spot on and has cured the line-up problem. last one in club stock so very lucky. Got some rubbers in, have asked a local member who I believe has the special tool to help with the last few.
Here's hoping...
Regards all.
Terry.
- Log in to post comments
Sounds like the earlier clutch which I am not familiar with. The inner case may be not secured in the right position or the hub spider internal stop may not be doing its job allowing the clutch drum to sit too close to the innercase.