AMC altered the geometry by lengthening the valves and shortening the pushrods on the 750 motors. They did not make any recommendations about the earlier 500,600,and 650 twins. Was this because they were not needed or because they did not consider they had any responsibility ?. I would have thought the 650 and 750 had similar geometry as the heads were very similar , and probably were based on the earlier motors?. Does that mean the 500/600/ 650 motors would benefit from the same modification?.It was said that the benefit was reduced wear to valve guides and that a horsepower or two was released.
Interesting Point.....but win some lose some!!!
- Log in to post comments
The real question is , when…
The real question is , when did the error arrive ? , sometime during the production at AMC or before? and will my 99 benefit from the upgrade. I suspect the only way to find out will be to spend some time with a spare head and valves and do some experimenting with a std and longer valve. The issue came to my attention when i found a broken adjuster on our Atlas which someone had fitted one long valve to without the shorter pushrod.
- Log in to post comments
simple change has effects
" The real question is , when did the error arrive ? "
The early low lift cams with valve/push rods would have balanced valve end scrub.
Now install a SS hi lift cam and the rocker tip scrubs way beyond valve center.
edited: A shorter push rod and longer valve repositions the valve tip scrub, due to the valve adjuster length is also being altered.
- Log in to post comments
Re-angling.....No! Not Fishing
Back in 1972 ish .....Norman White used to offered a Commando cylinder head mod where the position / angle of two of the valve guides was changes. This involved removal of the old guide, a small amount of Aluminium welding and then some drilling, reaming and seat cutting.
How exactly this worked I do not know. If the rocker remains in the same position then there must be some change in the point of contact and possibly the angle of said rocker when this occurs. Was the pushrod length and valve stem length altered???
Is this mod mentioned in Norma's recent book?
- Log in to post comments
After all this time???
After all this time ascertaining what happened with what part number all those year ago at AMC is becoming academic. BUT I have always thought someone might want to measure the valve geometry on a twin head? But it will not be easy. The compression ratio-due to the head/barrel machining (not piston) is part of the issue, push-rod length, valve stem length, and of course rocker ratio. Get your dial gauge out!! The cam shaft is a factor but how and how much/when???
There is some books on the subject I suggest these are studied before you make with the spanners. I have done this job (measure rocker advantage/or not on a basic car engine. You only do it once!) If any one wants to try this please get in touch.
- Log in to post comments
So what you are saying Dave…
So what you are saying Dave is that the error crept in with the SS cam . But perhaps not the Daytona cam?. Or perhaps not as bad with the Daytona as its lift is a little less than the SS?.That leaves an awfull lot of bikes with iffy valve action before E/N 126*****. No wonder AMC Norton kept quiet about them, Imagine having to recall that lot !!. They would have worked John Hudson to death.
- Log in to post comments
Errors or MFG variations?
If the original model seven was perfect then there would have been equal sweep before and after the valve center. more lift by daytona&QR would alter the location of sweep by the adjuster. The SS would sweep even more beyond valve center due to the even higher lift.
Also note the different cam grind base circle size requires rotating the valve adjuster. .040" is noted within norton cams even more base circle change in custom grinds.
By knowing the base circle and lobe lift would allow for perfect custom valve and pushrod length.
Very few would pursue this engineering effort or expense.
- Log in to post comments
It should be possible to…
It should be possible to fine tune the action using some lash caps and reducing the length of a pushrod , the lash cap can start at 0.1 inches and be ground down to suit .
- Log in to post comments
hello, would a cylinder…
hello,
would a cylinder barrel base decompression gasket have any effect on valve movement and pushrod length.or cam in some way.
barry
- Log in to post comments
It would effectively shorten…
It would effectively shorten the pushrods and be compensated for by the tappet adjuster .possibly an improvement on the situation? ,Together with a slight pocketing of the valve seat which effectively increases the length of the valve also. . Sound like the motor sorts itself out eventually !!.I think that is what has happened to our Atlas where I have had the pocketed seats re-profiled and fitted a compression plate. Sorted !. Now what to do about the 1960 99 ?.Lash caps and shorten the rods ?.
- Log in to post comments
The early 77, 88 and 99 engines all shared the same cylinder heads. generally casting number T2225. Then the inlet valves went up in size for the 22707 c/n versions. Roughly 1958 to 1961. The 500cc and 600cc Nomad bikes using a twin carb manifold version of that cylinder head. As did tuned Norton Twins ordered as Special Spec. This description later changing to Sports Special. The first two versions of the term SS.
The first 650 and second phase 1961 88SS used a modified 22707 cylinder head with the splayed exhausts and parallel carb mountings. The 650SS and 88SS bikes being classified as SS models ie Super Sports. Some 88SS cylinder heads were produced with 26mm inlet ports
The early Bracebridge Atlas engines used a 23166 casting. This being carried over to the first AMC made 650 and 750 heads which shared the same casting but machined to suit. The same applied to the later 650/750 heads which shared a 25139 casting.
Finally the 650 Mercury, later 750 Hybrids (possibly after e/n 126***) and Commandos all shared a 06-0380 casting, again machined to suit the engine application. These heads all had the longer (0.10") valve stems and shorter pushrods. This change was apparently made to alter the rocker angle and minimise scrubbing of the valve stem ends. Perhaps this worked in terms of less wear of the valve guides but strong rumours then emerged of pocketed valves leading to rockers thumping the inside of the heads. Win Some....lose some!!!!!