Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

Inter clubman plunger tool box

Forums

My 1950 plunger Inter clubman came to me without a tool box and it’s something I’d like to fit for practical reasons. I have studied web photos but I’m not confident of how the box is fixed to a clubmans bike, particularly the lower fixing arrangement. Would someone be so kind as to post some pics of the mounting arrangements and the correct tool box type to help me track one down?

There are two lugs on the upper rear frame tube, presume one or both will be for the tool box attachment, but nothing immediately obvious on the lower rail with the exception of the footrest mounting which doesn’t seem to match up with the vertical tab bracket I can see on a few tool boxes offered for sale, though none of them have been advertised as Inter. All thoughts and advice much appreciated, and if anyone does have a suitable tool box please let me know.

cheers

Bruce

Permalink

... - 1952 plunger ES2 - is similar and only uses the top 2 fastenings. It seems very rigid with those. I have no lower mounting tab, although the toolbox came in a box of spares from an aution so can't verify it's of original pattern.

It did take a while to source mine and it was in pretty ropy condition.

Permalink

....fits all plungers with the possibility the holes are drilled in different spots. I too found an orphan toolbox and needed to weld and redrill the upper mounting holes. Just the two, no lower mount.

Permalink

It may not be relevant, but for a short while, WD16Hs were fitted with double steel pannier toolboxes and the lug for the lower toolbox mount on the chainstay was deleted...when production reverted to a conventional box, they used a "P" clip around the stay. Even with the brazed lug, there was a short spacer tube that was not shown in the spare parts lists, although the 2 3/8" length of the bolt specified in the lists makes it clear that there must have been a spacer.

Permalink

Hi Bruce,

   Michael is correct, both plunger and rigid frames use the same box with the plunger ones fixed on the top only. The ones you have seen with the bottom bracket are for the rigid frame where the bottom frame tube runs close to the bottom of the box allowing a short bracket on the tube to join the one on the box. As there is no bottom support on the plunger type, it might be best to put a full length steel plate inside the top of the box to give more strength and support.

Permalink

On both my plunger frame bikes I put a bolt and suitable spacer from the bottom of the toolbox through the mudguard to stop any vibration.

John
 

Permalink

…for the advice, I think I know where to go with this now. Will see if I can pick one up and take it from there.

Cheers, Bruce

Permalink

This is a really old thread, but for anyone seeking clarification:  Tool boxes for Rigid frame bikes have a bracket on the bottom that bolts to one on the frame, as Richard Cornish stated above.  However, as per John Doig above,  the Plunger framed bikes use a 1/4" bolt (approx 1 1/2" long) that runs horizontally from the lower corner of the tool box through the right hand edge of the rear mudguard with a suitably sized spacer in between.  I believe the spacer is of the same material as used on the two rear mudguard to frame mounts.  Plunger type toolboxes all have this hole in the bottom.  There is a difference in the location of the top mounting holes, with them being closer together for Inters, and a bit further apart for ES2s because the frame brackets are not in exactly the same location.   On both my '50 ES2 and '47 Inter I had to place thin spacers under the upper mounting tabs in order to get the toolboxes to sit right.

Permalink

Hi Bruce,

   I have just had a look at your attached photo and it looks like you have a narrower Manx type mudguard. You should be able to make up a bracket from a flat mild steel strip if the spacer Howard mentions doesn't line up.
   I also see you have a pre 1948 Manx oil tank fitted, so I guess the bike was raced at sometime, do you have any history with the bike ?

Permalink

Hi Bruce/all,

   I had a look in the 1948/49 parts list and there isn't a bottom bolt listed for the plunger frame tool box. This was probably added a bit later when it was found the top panel was fracturing with the vibration.

Jon,

Your tool box looks neatly fitted and tucks in well under the seat. If you are not aware already, it is from a swinging-arm ES2 from 1953 to 55.

Permalink

It's how it arrived with me. Dan Field had an interest in it on a previous post. It houses battery, spare bulbs etc and the oily rag used to maintain ;-)
Jon

Permalink

Evening Folks
Thanks for the additional info, I managed to get hold of a toolbox as per attached pic, it is surely from a rigid machine as it has the bottom bracket. I will, however, need to make some inventive modifications to it - please forgive me - as the bike has a Brooklands can fitted which I wish to retain but this means the toolbox at present is looking like it may be a bit too deep, and would barely open due to proximity of the can. I'll ponder and fiddle with it in the cold months.
Cheers
Bruce

Attachments
Permalink

...of which I have some, but being new to the world of Inter Nortons I would very much appreciate any further enlightenment.  Both Barry Stickland and Paul Watkins were most helpful when buying the bike and their dig into the records found that it started life as a clubmans spec bike (it's a 500), and was entered into the 1950 clubmans TT by Bury & district MCC, rider RK Pilling. Race records show he ended up being entered on a Triumph but did not start... the Inter was registered 1st June with the race on the 7th so this short time gap may be why it missed it's chance of glory.
AEN231 is a Bury number.
The engine is not the original and was apparently changed very early on, Barry identified pre-war crankcases, and an early cambox from a coil spring head. Gearbox appears to be the original with huge gap between first and second.
I bought the bike from a fellow NOC member, it had belonged to his late father since 1973, I'm unsure as to how much use it had between then and now, and no idea of history between 1950 and 73.
Obvious changes are the tanks which are steel soldered type - is this what identifies them as pre-48? It has a conical Manx front brake, home made instrument panel, primary chain case and Brooklands can, the latter two by the previous owner. Alloy guards. A small battery box has been fitted on the n/s.
Now on to anecdotes and clues...
I have a photo of it from what looks like late 50's or early 60's with a mega, alloy guards, racing seat, lights (but no dynamo) and a different front brake.
The engine is said to have come from Harold Daniell's, and it's suggested Reg Dearden worked the cyl head at some point. I have a hand written note of both engine and gearbox rebuilds from pre-decimal days but no name or date, can post photos if anyone's interested.
Beyond that, it's all question marks. We're now about 400 miles into the relationship and have endured fractured footrest, rear fuel tank bracket, top oil tank bracket, the Brooklands can burst open Laurel and Hardy style, both fuel taps leak like mad despite much dressing and lapping, a cyl head joint re-do, and other more minor teething troubles associated with bringing any old warrior back to life after years of inactivity. But it is fantastic, I understand the reverence.
some pics attached, the colour ones were taken before I laid a finger on it. any observations welcome, thanks.
cheers
Bruce

Permalink

All the signs of a machine that evolved over the years. The variations show it was kept active beyond its race career.  I have a similar history to my machine which s somewhat older but the end result is similar to yours.
 They are a great ride, powerful enough to keep up and set up right the stopping is not a problem as long as you ride according to the machine not to modern machine performance.

Enjoy it! 

Jon 

 



© 2024 Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans